WHID 2009-16: Primary schools hit by smut hack

Updated: 
5 February 2009
Attack Information
WHID ID: 
2009-16
Date Occured: 
30 Jan 2009
Attack Method: 
Outcome Information
Outcome: 
Target Information
Attacked Entity Field: 
Education
Attacked Entity Geography: 
UK
Attacked System's Technology: 
Moodle

Not all defacement are created equal. I have a second grader who has just started to use her school's web site so this defacement of 20 primary school web sites with porn hit me deep inside. We do so much to screen our young ones from the sleazy world outside, and getting it in the school's web site is just unimaginable. Just thinking about the questions I would be asked if my daughter would get such pages.

The incident also highlights the total breakup of cyber security. The incident is blamed on an unpatched version of Moodle, an open source on-line education software. The naive way ot thinking would be that schools don't have the budgets to protect their applications or even to upgrade them. However, as this incident shows, proper security is fundamental and a substantial part of the budget should be allocated to it, even it means we spend less on the application features. We need to move slower but ensure security. After all, what is the value of an educational system that shows porn?

Another insight is that real time controls for protecting web applications are essential. You need a WAF. While the specific vulnerability exploited is unknown, Installing ModSecurity would have probably prevented the exploit.

"Just thinking about the questions I would be asked if my daughter would get such pages."

An opportunity to talk about sex, porn and computer security, all in one go.

A lot of adults seem to think that their reactions to porn are similar to their kids reactions to porn. A moments thought should tell you that this isn't the case for most of childhood; and by the time it is the case, you should already be talking about it. Young kids want to know what's going on but are not normally affected emotionally because they have no emotionally link to the scene they're viewing.

I am personally not comfortable with the previous comment, but decided that it is acceptable and censorship is not right. If someone strongly feels differently, let me know.

~ Ofer Shezaf, WHID project leader

The cited article stated: "Twenty schools' sites have fallen victim..." (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/04/school_website_defacement/)

My first reaction in regard to the incident would be to check whether these schools' pages were hosted by the same commercial provider that did not provide an adequate security and user education.